A latest DOJ proposal explored the thought of merging the DEA (Drug Enforcement Company) and the BATFE (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, often known as ATF) right into a single tremendous company. The proposal states the next:
To most efficiently, successfully, and effectively proceed the combat to eradicate the designated cartel overseas terrorist organizations (FTOs) and search to eradicate violent crime, ATF can be included into the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), addressing each drug and gun crimes. This transition can be initiated in FY 2026 and obtain efficiencies in sources and case deconfliction.
Sounds good, proper?
What it Means
Shortly after this announcement, pro-gun advocacy teams issued vehement statements condemning the mix. The Firearms Coverage Coalition (FPC) expressed it strongly:
By merging the ATF’s firearms enforcement authority into the DEA, the DOJ is successfully equating peaceful American gun homeowners with drug cartels, turning thousands and thousands of law-abiding residents—in addition to their constitutionally protected weapons—into co-equal targets of a militarized federal enforcement regime.
FPC and plenty of different teams argue {that a} mixed company would pose a much bigger, extra militarized menace to law-abiding residents, and that an company meant to focus on drug cartels and gangs shouldn’t be harassing on a regular basis residents.
Gun House owners of America took this a step additional by sending an in depth joint coalition letter to the White Home and the DOJ, the place they outlined twelve causes the merger “represents an unprecedented menace to gun rights.” A few of these causes are as follows:
- ATF Entry to DEA Assets Would Greater than Triple the Gun-Management Funds.
- A Merger Would Militarize Extra Federal Brokers In opposition to Legislation-Abiding People.
- ATF Would Achieve Unprecedented Intelligence and Surveillance Capabilities.
- Blurring the Strains Between ATF and Extra Widespread Companies Would Insulate ATF from Criticism.
(To learn the whole checklist, test the letter out right here.)
Zooming Out
A merger might be each disastrous and dangerous to gun homeowners and 2A advocates. Nevertheless, such a change doubtless requires congressional approval. But, Legal professional Common Pam Bondi argues that the DOJ doesn’t. A political battle is brewing as members of each events conflict over these points. Some will say it negatively impacts Second Modification rights, whereas others will oppose govt overreach. As of now, the merger is predicted to start in 2026.
For extra Outside HUB information, click on right here.
Sources
